November 2001
Parish
History Episode 7
THE ROMAN MISSION
In 570, Gregory, son of Gordian, was a young man of
about thirty, a son of an ancient aristocratic family of Rome, of
a pious upbringing (his great-grandfather had been Pope Felix III).
He was employed successively in a number of administrative posts in
the city of Rome, which was then a dependency of the Byzantine (or
East Roman) Empire, and under threat from the Lombard tribes who had
occupied much of Italy. He was possibly acting in the capacity of
a market inspector, when he engaged in conversation with a merchant
who was offering a number of barbarian slave children for sale. He
learned from the slave trader that they came from a pagan land called
Deira, which had once been part of the former Roman province of Britain.
In 575, Gregory resigned from the municipal service, to the disappointment
of his family, and became a monk in one of the houses close to Rome
recently established by the followers of Benedict, the patriarch of
Western monasticism. Gregory then moved back into administrative work,
in the service of Pope Pelagius II, and on that pope’s death
in 590, Gregory was elected pope in his place - the first monk to
receive that honour.
Pope Gregory the Great, as he is known, became a famous preacher and
writer. In liturgy, he introduced various Greek features into the
Roman Mass, but in politics he defended the independence of the Roman
See from Byzantine interference. He despatched embassies to the Gothic
Kingdom in Spain, which succeeded in “reconciling” the
Arian faith of the Goths with the Catholic faith of their subjects,
and also tried to persuade the Lombard chiefs, who also inclined towards
Arianism, to accept the Catholic practices of the majority of Italians.
Further afield (and prompted, possibly, by the memory of those slave
boys exposed for sale in the market at Rome), he despatched, in the
year 596, a group of missionaries, led by Augustine, to the Isle of
Britain. Early in 597 Augustine and his party landed in Kent, where
King Ethelbert had married Bertha, a Frankish (Christian) princess,
and she welcomed the arrival of the monks from Rome. Ethelbert was
already interested in his wife’s religion, and before long he,
together with many of his people, accepted Baptism.
He does not appear to have compelled, or even encouraged, any of his
subjects to become Christian. Indeed, the new religion was slow to
spread amongst the Jutish aristocrats who ruled Kent, and most of
the “converts” were native Britons who probably already
considered themselves Christians, but they had been deprived of the
Sacraments of the Church as a consequence of the flight of the British
clergy towards Wales, and other areas beyond the reach of the English
invaders.
Augustine became the first Archbishop of Canterbury, and during the
next few years additional bishops were appointed for Rochester and
London, but the Roman Mission was still confined to the South-Eastern
corner of England, until 625, when opportunity was taken of the marriage
of King Ethelbert’s daughter, Ethelburga, to King Edwin of Deira
- the homeland, apparently, of Gregory’s slave boys - who had
conquered Bernicia, and now styled himself King of Northumbria. A
monk called Paulinus was consecrated as a bishop, and despatched from
Canterbury to Edwin’s capital city of York.
His journey to the North was like a royal progress. He visited former
Roman cities, such as Lincoln and Doncaster, and preached to multitudes
who came forward for Baptism (again, these “multitudes”
were probably mostly native Britons). The same scenes were repeated
in York, and the King was baptised in 627. Later Paulinus accompanied
King Edwin to a royal hunting lodge at Yeavering (near Wooler), where
he held a five weeks’ mission, reaching out to the Celtic peasants
of the Cheviot Hills.
On that journey, Paulinus must have crossed what was later known as
County Durham, perhaps passing near the site of the future Houghton-le-Spring.
But Bede tells us nothing about his journey, only his achievements
when he reached Yeavering, so we don’t even know what people
lived then between the Tees and the Tyne.
Then, in 633, the Roman Mission suddenly collapsed. King Edwin was
trying to extend his power by conquering the Midland kingdom of Mercia.
King Cadwallon of Gwynedd (North Wales) came to the aid of King Penda
of Mercia, and the allies defeated and killed King Edwin. As soon
as news of the King’s death in battle reached York, Queen Ethelburga,
together with Archbishop Paulinus and, apparently, most of the other
Roman clergy, abandoned the city, took flight for Brough on the Humber,
where they found ships to take them to Kent, Ethelburga’s homeland.
King Cadwallon, who was a Christian, then seems to have withdrawn
from the fray, but the pagan King Penda went on to ravage most of
Northumbria, destroying all traces of Paulinus’ work that he
could find.
If it had been only in Northumbria that the Roman Mission had collapsed,
we might see the disaster as being the accidental consequence of King
Edwin’s defeat and death. But most of the other fields of the
Roman Mission - Lincolnshire, East Anglia, Essex, Middlesex, everywhere
except Kent - also relapsed at much the same time, so it does seem
that the Mission had something lacking. How did it fail?
Well, to their credit, the Roman missionaries did not attempt to force
a change of religion on the English. Although the missions in both
Kent and Northumbria began with a royal wedding, of a pagan king to
a Christian princess, and in both states the king was baptised, no-one
was compelled to follow his example. The majority of the aristocracy
remained pagan, and the bulk of the “converts”, outside
the Royal Courts, were British peasants, already regarding themselves
as Christians, but cut off from the ministrations of the Church by
the flight, death or apostasy of their priests, and apparently unwilling
to accept lay celebration of the Sacraments.
The flight of the Roman monks from every mission field save Kent (and
they were, at one point, Bede tells us, even planning the evacuation
of Kent) nullifies their criticism of their British predecessors for
abandoning their flocks at the time of the English conquest. But the
paralysis of the Church by their flight points to another of their
failings: they had neglected to even begin the training of a native
(British or English) clergy to replace them when they were gone. They
assumed that, on their deaths, their charges would be inherited by
another generation of Italian monks.
R.H.Hodgkin, in his “History of the Anglo-Saxons”, writes
“the clergy of Augustine did their duty according to their lights,
but, like some more modern missionaries, they did not easily mingle
with their converts; and it appears that, some sixty years after the
coming of Augustine, his Italian successors were still not able to
speak the English language with any fluency.
They had tried, but they had failed. It remains to record, next month,
a more successful mission.
For further reading :-
Bede’s History of the English Church and People
(on which I relied for the above account; but for an alternative Welsh
view, see Nennius’ History of Britain)
R.H.Hodgkin, A History of the Anglo-Saxons