November 2002
Parish
History Episode 19
Rome and Normandy
There has been little enough to record of the village
of Houghton-le-Spring since its foundation by Anglian settlers around
the Sixth Century. It and the whole region around was devastated by
Halfdane's Vikings in the late Ninth Century, and there was probably
nothing of Houghton but a mean hamlet when the monks bore Cuthbert's
corpse down from Warden Law, to rebury it at Durham, in the late Tenth
Century.
Houghton was not to be reborn as a village of even local importance
until after the Norman Conquest. when its surviving peasants would
he incorporated into the Norman feudal system and the parochial system
of the Roman Catholic Church. But before attempting to view the rebirth
of Houghton, it would be useful to describe the rise of these twin
powers. Rome and Normandy, which were to have such an influence on
our country and our village.
We may recall that, though the Iona Mission may have been more important
for England as a whole, the Mission despatched by Pope Gregory to
Canterbury in 597 had always been dominant in Kent. and, at the Synod
of Whitby in 664, the Roman customs were adopted by the Northurnbrians,
and soon afterwards by the whole of the British Isles. For the next
hundred years or so, the primacy of Rome was to be freely acknowledged
by the English Churches, although the popes, concerned chiefly with
their relationship with their earthly sovereigns, the Byzantine Emperors,
had paid but little attention to English affairs. Then, for a further
century. say 760 to 860, the popes were similarly dependent on the
Frankish kings.
For all that, during the periods of Byzantine and of Frankish domination
of the Papacy, there were able, learned and devout popes: they had
to take account of the realities of their position and to conciliate
the princes of this world, but they upheld their office for the most
part, and played an effective part in Church affairs, at least in
that empire which at the time seemed to dominate the world scene,
if not in remote kingdoms such as Northumbria. But as the Frankish
power collapsed under the onslaught of Viking and other raiders, and
as Rome became freed from allegiance to the House of Charlemagne,
so the Papacy became dependent upon the "patricians", on
the upper classes of Rome. Successive popes were inducted into office,
often after great dispute and violence, because they were the tool
of this or that faction of Roman patricians; and most of the popes
of this period, roughly 860 to 960. were devoid of leadership, administrative
capability, learning, or even, it seems, of piety. Then, in the middle
of the Tenth Century, a new German monarchy was created by the victories
of Heinrich, and his son Otto, Over the Vikings and Magyars. Otto
decided to elevate himself by marching, in 962, at the head of his
knights, to Rome, in order to seek coronation by the pope as the first
Kaiser of the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation. He had no intention
of interfering in the affairs of the Papacy, but the situation that
he found there seemed so scandalous to the knights and prelates in
his train, who had by then been deeply influenced by the reforms associated
with the monastery at Cluny. in Burgundy, that Otto arranged to depose
Pope John XII, for the many sins alleged against him, and to replace
him with another man, who became Leo VIII.
The next four Kaisers after Otto I all marched on
Ronne at least once during their reign. and all found themselves being
beseeched by various factions of the Roman nobility to depose or discipline
the current pope, and all took such action as they deemed appropriate.
The result was that the Papacy improved considerably in moral tone.
but became more and more dependent on the German Kaisers
Reform up to this time had been primarily an incidental
consequence of the Kaisers' armbition to be crowned in Rome, and to
be seen as Defenders of the Faith. But then in 1039 there succeeded
a new Kaiser, Heinrich III, a pious man, who wanted Reform for its
own sake. If lie had had his own way, the Roman Church might have
become as dependent on the German emperors as was the Church of Constantinople
on the Byzantine emperors. But one way that the Roman popes could
shake off the German influence would be for them to themselves see
to the reformation of the Church. But the impetus still came, in the
first instance, from North of the Alps.
In 1045, on learning that there were three rival claimants
to the Papal Throne in Rome, Heinrich III marched into Italy, deposed
all three, and arranged for the Bishop of Bamberg (in Germany) to
be elected as Pope Clement II. When Clement died in 1046, he was replaced
by Damasus II, who had up to then been Bishop of Brixen. However the
Reforms of Cluny had reached Bamberg and Brixen, and this German interference
in Roman affairs was to prove wholly beneficial.
Even so, their achievements were to be greatly transcended
by those of Damasus' successor, Pope Leo IX and Leo's Secretary of
State, a monk called Hildebrand. During the five years of Leo's pontificate
(1049 to 1054), he and Hildebrand began a practice, hitherto unknown,
of regularly travelling from Rome, to visit other cities of Italy,
in order to root out vice, particularly simony (the sale of clerical
offices) and clerical marriage. There was at this time a movement
of popular religion in Italy, known as the Patara, a sort of Moral
Majority to use a modern term, which was calling into being mobs of
violent enthusiasts who literally chased priests and bishops out of
their homes and towns, if popular gossip accused there of financial
speculation, or sexual immorality, or even of lawful marriage.
Priests, with their wives and children, were hounded
out of their homes, and occasionally lynched.
Pope Leo and Hildebrand did not of course approve
of lynch-mobs. To obviate the need for them, they established a system
of Church Courts. so that immoral priests could be disciplined, and
married ones forced either to discard their wives or leave their office.
Having, so to speak, ridden the Patara in Italy, Pope
Leo and Hildebrand then attempted to extend the reforms to the rest
of Latin Europe. Three times in as many years they toured the heartlands
of Western Europe, visiting France, Germany and Hungary, holding synods
and imposing new disciplines wherever they went. New cathedrals were
built, in Romanesque style (most of them later demolished, to be replaced
by grander Gothic buildings) and codes of canon law were drawn up,
with rules binding not only on the clergy but on the laity as well.
Suddenly Europe - at least, Latin Europe woke up to
the realisation that there was Law in Europe, above the local laws.
After six centuries of anarchy, Rome ruled again, though a very different
Rome to that of the Caesars. Leo never, it is true, visited Bohemia
or Poland. Scandinavia or our islands, or the new Christian kingdoms
emerging in Northern Spain, but these were peripheral areas. The core
of the continent had been subdued by Rome.
Pope Leo not only welded Latin Europe into a new unity.
He also, unintentionally, left it separated from Eastern Christianity.
This arose from his policy towards Sicily and Southern Italy. When,
three hundred years before, the Franks had taken control of Northern
and Central Italy, they had left the South in the hands of the Byzantine
Emperors. Unfortunately the Byzantines, once they had lost control
of Rome, transferred the allegiance of the Southern dioceses from
Rome to Constantinople, which infuriated the Popes.
Later, however, most of Sicily and the South were
conquered by the Arabs.
Appeals for help against these Saracens were made
by the Sicilians, and in about 1016 boatloads of knights began to
arrive from Normandy - that area of Northern France where a sort of
Danelaw had been conceded to the Norsemen by the Franks in 911. Within
only a hundred years these descendants of the Vikings had been transmuted
somehow into French-speaking knights, and now saw themselves as the
champions of Latin Christianity. The Romans however watched their
progress with anxiety, and feared a Norman attack on Rome itself.
Pope Leo accordingly despatched an embassy to Constantinople
with a proposal that the Byzantines should return to Sicily, destroy
the Normans, and restore the Emperor's authority in the South, but
that the dioceses of the South should be placed under the authority
of the Popes of Rome, not that of the Patriarchs of Constantinople.
The Emperor gave a guarded welcome to the embassy,
but the Patriarch did not, and soon the Greek and the Roman churchmen
were serving writs of excommunication upon each other, the latter
doing so in the name of the Pope. Although doctrinal issues soon became
involved, this episode in 1054 was the start of a mutual estrangement
between the Churches of East and West which has by now lasted for
nearly a thousand years.
The further effect of these mutual excommunications was that the West
was cut off from the learning of the East, and became more Inward-looking,
but now that Leo had united the Western lands as never before. the
Churches on the fringes of the Latin sphere, like those of Poland
and Bohemia, had either to gravitate towards Rome, or alternatively
draw away from Rome towards Constantinople. as the Russians and Bulgarians
did. Where there had been one Church, there were now two sects.
England, remote from Constantinople, bad no real choice in where to
place its allegiance. So England would now acknowledge the primacy
of the Roman Church. That in itself was nothing new. Rome bad been
important before, as the source of the mission that had brought Augustine
to Canterbury. More recently, Rome had been the goal towards which
thousands of English pilgrims had tramped, and to which had been despatched
chests of "Peter's Pence". But it had sent back surprisingly
little in return. But soon legates and canon lawyers would be making
the journey from Rome to England. From now on, Rome was going to rule
the West, not simply to sit inactive and receive tribute.
But for the moment the English Church was still unreformed. Neither
Pope Leo nor Hildebrand (who was himself to become Pope in 1073, after
advising Leo IX and four of Leo's successors on policy) had ever visited
England. Many of the English clergy were married, and to foreign eyes
they looked coarse end rustic and old-fashioned, It was not to be
until the Norman invasion that real reformation would come to England.
The Normans had maintained their power in Sicily and Southern Italy,
and in 1066 they would make the short sea voyage from their French
homeland to England. At the end of the century they would take a leading
role in the First Crusade. They became at this period the Knights
of God".