October 2005
Parish
History Episode 54
Richard Wyche
As was mentioned in August’s “Signpost”,
John Newton had, in 1410, become Rector of Houghton-le-Spring. He
also became Master of
Sherburn Hospital, and held various other posts which gave him the
benefit of good, regular incomes. He however undertook few duties
in
these responsible posts, other than collecting the tithes and drawing
any salaries pertaining to them. He spent most of his time and energy
in service in the Chancellery of Durham Diocese, undertaking duties
which should have been performed by the Bishop of Durham, Cardinal
Langley. The Cardinal himself often needed to be absent from his diocese,
as he had duties in London, where he was three times Lord Chancellor
of England; and in England’s conquests abroad, serving on the
battlefield at
Agincourt, and at the peace conference at Troyes; and also in the
Papal service, in Rome, or at the Ecumenical Councils held at Pisa
in 1409 and Constance in 1414. Though Langley certainly took an active
interest in his diocese, and returned to Durham from time to time,
many of his administrative duties had to be undertaken by such men
as Rector Newton.
Much of the Rector’s work was probably routine and undemanding.
But in 1413, an important development occurred. A Lollard conventicle
had been uncovered in Newcastleupon- Tyne, and had apparently been
active there for ten years. This was surprising news. Lollardry, unlawful
everywhere in England, had been, up to now, predominantly a South
Country religion. It had tended to flourish in particular regions.
These included the London area, together with Kent, Essex and East
Anglia - all districts relatively close to the mainland of Europe.
The Chiltern Hills, to the North-West of
London, seems also to have been a stronghold of the movement. Westward
of London, Lollard groups flourished along the great rivers of the
South - the Thames, the Bristol Avon, the Wye, the Severn, and the
Warwick-shire Avon.
The movement made headway among mining communities in the Forest of
Dean andthe Mendip Hills. It was also, thanks to Swinderby’s
preaching, strong along the Welsh Borders (but not over the Border,
in Welsh speaking districts). Some Midland cities, notably Coventry
and Leicester, had also proved hospitable to Lollardry. But it hardly
affected the North of England. Previously, no Lollards had been known
north of Wakefield in
Yorkshire. But now, a group had been discovered skulking in Newcastle.
The city authorities had arrested a mixed bunch of men and women,
and lodged them in the Keep of Newcastle’s eponymous castle.
Newton rode
over to investigate, and found them mostly to be skilled workingmen
(smiths, weavers, and the like) or the wives of workingmen. But one
man
stood out. His accent was foreign to Tyneside, and he appeared to
be a clerk in holy orders, though unbeneficed.
He came in fact from Herefordshire. He was a disciple of Swinderby,
a Lollard “hedge-priest” if ever there was one. His name
was Richard Wyche.
Wyche, together with other leaders of the Newcastle conventicle, was
taken back to Durham, and placed in secure accommodation in the Castle
there, so that Newton and others could begin their interrogation.
The procedure seems to have been highly successful. None of the prisoners
stood up to implied threats of torture. They all confessed their complicity
in heresy, and surrendered copies of forbidden literature, including
handwritten Gospels in English (One such Gospel belonged to an illiterate
man. Presumably, he had kept it as a sort of holy charm. Or perhaps
he had intended to learn to read.). Each of the defendants pleaded
that he had been led astray by others of the accused. They all, including
Wyche, abjured their heresies.
Satisfied at having done a good job, Newton let them all go. He had,
he hoped, wiped out incipient heresy in the North Country. They had
learned their lessons. Their Bibles had been confiscated. They wouldn’t
repeat their offence in a hurry.
But Newton did not comprehend the wickedness of mankind. The confession
and recantation of Richard Wyche may have satisfied Newton, but we
know that it was insincere. Within a year he was writing letters in
Latin to Prague, explaining that his mission on Tyneside had come
to grief, that the lackeys of the Bishop of Durham had penetrated
their cell,
had arrested everyone, and that the whole enterprise had come to grief.
His letters can still be seen in what were the Royal Archives of Bohemia.
If such correspondence had fallen into the hands of John Newton, Wyche
would have been quickly sent to the stake as a relapsed heretic. But
he was not to be caught for many long years. Throughout the reigns
of the three Kings of England of the House of Lancaster, all named
Henry (the Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Henries), the Lollard movement
survived, and
suffered continual persecution. It was not a very fierce persecution
by the standards of some Tudor monarchs, particularly Mary I and Elizabeth
I: about three martyrs a year were burned at the stake.
Most of those arrested were permitted to renounce their beliefs, and
then set at liberty. An authorised Life of Jesus was produced in English,
which it was hoped would satisfy the demand for knowledge about Christ,
and would make the Lollard Bible superfluous. But copies of the Bible
continued to be copied out in secret, and circulated clandestinely.
Dozens of copies still survive, despite the arrival, in Tudor times,
of better translations, mass-produced through the invention of printing,
and therefore comparatively cheap. Those few copies extant to-day
are probably the survivors of thousands which once existed in middle-class
homes up and down the country. Many of the owners probably had no
other connection with heresy than the possession of one copy of a
proscribed book - the Bible in English. They just wanted to refer
to it from time to time, to check up on a passage, to see if they
had understood the Latin text that they had heard read out at the
Mass on Sunday.
Such clandestine ownership of Bibles does not in
itself indicate that most Englishmen were alienated from their traditional
religion. More traditional types of spirituality survived, alongside
the newer practice of reading the
Bible at home.
For instance, schools and chantry chapels (places where priests sang
Mass for the souls of the founders of the chapel) were multiplying
all
over England. In the Southern and Eastern counties, from the far South-West
to the Norfolk Broads, new churches were also being built, in the
style now known as “Perpendicular”, characterised by greater
height than that usually seen in earlier churches, by long, thin columns
of stone, by larger windows admitting more light, squarer in shape
and less pointed
than traditional Gothic, and by magnificent fanvaulting spreading
across the ceilings. Such churches are almost entirely absent from
the North. Presumably there was less wealth up here to finance such
developments, and such wealth as there was tended to be used for the
building of castles rather than churches.
Images of the saints also proliferated in all churches, old or new:
images in stone, in alabaster, in wood, in tapestry, or as mosaics
on the walls, or in the stained-glass windows. Pilgrimages were also
increasingly popular. Tens of thousands of pilgrims made their way
to the Shrines of Thomas Becket at Canterbury (as Chaucer recounts,
in his “Canterbury Tales”) or
to that of Our Lady at Walsingham.
Such crowds also of course attracted pickpockets and all sorts of
rogues and vagabonds. It was not unknown for them to attract Lollard
preachers. The irrepressible Richard Wyche once turned up to address
a crowd of pilgrims at Walsingham. He described Mary, the Mother of
Jesus, as “the Witch of Walsingham”, almost a pun on his
own name. He managed to escape before the sheriff had him arrested.
Such exploits seem almost as silly as Robin Hood’s legendary
tormenting of the Sheriff of Nottingham. But he could not be lucky
for ever. In 1440, when he must have been about sixty years old, he
was captured near London, tried and condemned, taken to Smithfield,
and burned alive at the stake.
Naturally, his despatches to Prague now ceased. But he was not the
only Englishman who looked for succour from the East. A fugitive priest
called Peter Payne was, by the time of Wyche’s martyrdom, acting
as a sort of Lollard ambassador both to the Kingdom of Bohemia and
to Constantinople. He received plenty of blessings from the Hussites
of Bohemia, but little practical help. From Constantinople, he did
not even receive a blessing.
The Byzantine Empire now consisted of only three fragments of territory,
none of them the size of an English county. In 1453, the Turks would
finally give the coup de grace, and destroy this empire which had
defied them, and their Arab and Persian predecessors, for a thousand
years. But the last patriarchs before the Fall of Constantinople -
prelates seen as
arrogant and effete, and long despised by the vulgar Christians of
the West - had by now become, in their own estimation at least, the
Judges of the West.
The Patriarchs of Constantinople had first become used, during the
Great Schism in the West, to receiving ambassadors from the rival
Papal Courts at Rome and at Avignon, each ambassador being anxious
to receive
recognition from the East that his master was the true pope. Then,
similar embassies began arriving from Prague, with these clerics attempting
to persuade the Patriarch that their Church was every bit as legitimate
a
development as were the Churches of other Slavonic nations, such as
those of the Serbs, the Bulgarians and the Russians, all of whom were
in Communion with Constantinople.
Seeing in the Czechs an ally against their common enemy, Rome, the
Greeks were willing to grant their new friends all sorts of liturgical
freedoms that they would never have tolerated in the Balkans or in
Russia. But the Archbishops of Prague never acknowledged the supremacy
of Constantinople, and the Patriarchs realised that the Czech Liturgy
was not really simply a new development of the Slavonic Rite.
But then Peter Payne, known to the Greeks as Petros Angelikos, Peter
the Englishman, presented himself at Constantinople, an emissary from
the furthest West, a doctor of St. Edmund Hall in Oxford (degraded),
and a priest of the English Church (unfrocked). He explained that
while the Church in England was, traditionally, subject to the Roman
Pope, he himself, along with many others, had renounced Rome, and
looked instead to Prague and the ancient Church at Constantinople,
and that the English, if given encouragement, would all embrace Greek
Orthodoxy.
The Patriarch received him politely (as another possible future ally
against Rome), but was obviously dubious about Peter Payne’s
claim to represent the English Church.
Such long-distance contacts were, anyway, obviously of little real
importance at that time. What was perhaps more significant was the
way
that, at a time of great popular piety (the pilgrimages to Walsingham
and elsewhere, the multiplying images of the saints, the “Perpendicular”
churches), men like Richard Wyche were being burned alive at the stake.
The Christian religion had once been a means of grace. But now, it
seemed, Christians had been reduced to slaughtering each other, by
as
cruel means as possible, because of disagreements over doctrine, or
church policy, or even because they disagreed over what language should
be used for writing the Scriptures.
The schism between Rome and Avignon was at last coming to an end.
But the Devil, it seemed, still had a trick or two to play. He could
foment new doctrines and new schisms, and new hatreds could be implanted
within the hearts of Christian men, driving them into devilishly cruel
behaviour against one other.
Dick
Toy
Previous
Parish Histories